Header Ads

55-year-old dark side of the moon mystery solved

moon's dark side

UNIVERSITY PARK, Pa. -- The "man in the moon" appeared when meteoroids struck the Earth-facing side of the moon creating large flat seas of basalt that we see as dark areas called maria. But no "face" exists on farside of the moon and now, Penn State astrophysicists think they know why.
"I remember the first time I saw a globe of the moon as a boy, being struck by how different the farside looks," said Jason Wright, assistant professor of astrophysics. "It was all mountains and craters. Where were the maria? It turns out it's been a mystery since the fifties."
This mystery is called the Lunar Farside Highlands Problem and dates back to 1959, when the Soviet spacecraft Luna 3 transmitted the first images of the dark side of the moon back to Earth. It was called the dark side because it was unknown, not because sunlight does not reach it. Researchers immediately noticed that fewer "seas" or maria existed on this portion of the moon that always faces away from Earth.
Wright, Steinn Sigurdsson, professor of astrophysics and Arpita Roy, graduate student in astronomy and astrophysics, and lead author of the study, realized that the absence of maria, which is due to a difference in crustal thickness between the side of the moon we see and the hidden side, is a consequence of how the moon originally formed. The researchers report their results in today's (June 9) Astrophysical Journal Letters.
The general consensus on the moon's origin is that it probably formed shortly after the Earth and was the result of a Mars-sized object hitting Earth with a glancing, but devastating impact. This Giant Impact Hypothesis suggests that the outer layers of the Earth and the object were flung into space and eventually formed the moon.
"Shortly after the giant impact, the Earth and the moon were very hot," said Sigurdsson.
The Earth and the impact object did not just melt; parts of them vaporized, creating a disk of rock, magma and vapor around the Earth.
"The moon and Earth loomed large in each others skies when they formed, " said Roy.
The geometry was similar to the rocky exoplanets recently discovered very close to their stars, said Wright. The moon was 10 to 20 times closer to Earth than it is now, and the researchers found that it quickly assumed a tidally locked position with the rotation time of the moon equal to the orbital period of the moon around the Earth. The same real estate on the moon has probably always faced the Earth ever since. Tidal locking is a product of the gravity of both objects.
The moon, being much smaller than Earth cooled more quickly. Because the Earth and the moon were tidally locked from the beginning, the still hot Earth -- more than 2500 degrees Celsius -- radiated towards the near side of the moon. The far side, away from the boiling Earth, slowly cooled, while the Earth-facing side was kept molten creating a temperature gradient between the two halves.
This gradient was important for crustal formation on the moon. The moon's crust has high concentrations of aluminum and calcium, elements that are very hard to vaporize.
"When rock vapor starts to cool, the very first elements that snow out are aluminum and calcium," said Sigurdsson.
Aluminum and calcium would have preferentially condensed in the atmosphere of the cold side of the moon because the nearside was still too hot. Thousands to millions of years later, these elements combined with silicates in the moon's mantle to form plagioclase feldspars, which eventually moved to the surface and formed the moon's crust, said Roy. The farside crust had more of these minerals and is thicker.
The moon has now completely cooled and is not molten below the surface. Earlier in its history, large meteoroids struck the nearside of the moon and punched through the crust, releasing the vast lakes of basaltic lava that formed the nearside maria that make up the man in the moon. When meteoroids struck the farside of the moon, in most cases the crust was too thick and no magmatic basalt welled up, creating the dark side of the moon with valleys, craters and highlands, but almost no maria.
The NASA Astrobiology Institute and the Pennsylvania State Astrobiology Research Center supported this work.
moon's dark side


  1. Is science 100% sure that the Moon has completely turned solid? I knew the Maria were lava flows, but I did not know that the Moon was completely cold now.

    As to why the lava on one side, my first speculation was that it was due to the Earth's gravity pull creating a thinner crust on one side (Due to the tidal locking), and the articles reasoning seems very logical to me.

  2. I have never seen a globe of the moon. Now I want one. I shall now go buy one.

  3. Because the moons surface is glasslike it will naturally help insulate the internal radiation from ever completely escaping thus keeping a degree of fluidity within the core. This is my theory anyway. But I thought this new 55 yr old lunar mystery had been solved already in as many words well before today

  4. fewer objects of the size necessary to punch through the far side crust impacted. Just looking at the provided far side image reveals no caters as large as the ones which produced the seas of magmatic basalt on the near side.

    The real mystery here imo is why an new, alternative reason for the lack of seas on the far side is necessary when the "fewer large impacts" theory fits the visual evidence so well?

    And I ain't saying the 'thicker crust on the far side' theory isn't valid, it may well have happened that way, but as a means of explaining why fewer seas exist on that side it just seems unnecessary. The fewer large impacts possibility is self evident.


Powered by Blogger.